SBD: Thieves as heroes
Apr. 7th, 2008 10:34 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It is Monday, and time for Beth's SBD.
I borrowed La Nora's Homeport from the library over the weekend -- I saw a copy on a display, and couldn't remember if I'd read it before. Anyway, the hero is a thief. And I've decided that's just one profession that doesn't work for me for a hero. I don't find anything heroic about stealing; even Robin Hood is a hard sell for me. (Alan Rickman's Sheriff of Nottingham utterly overshadows Costner's Prince of Thieves.)
But I like Roarke from the In Death series, don't I? Well, yes. But he makes no excuses about what he did, and was mostly straight by the time Dallas appeared in his life. Plus, as Tiko says in Strangers in Death, Stealing's lazy.
In Homeport, Ryan steals because he can. And his mother (a devout Catholic) justifies it because his ability to steal is a god-given gift. Plus, it paid for college for his siblings. That doesn't work for me as a justification, and I think it is a slippery slope. Because if theft is okay because it is a natural skill, then all kinds of other horrendous behavior must be okay, by the same token. Sociopaths who have a god-given ability to torture should be let on their merry way? I don't think so. And paying for your siblings' educations? Nice. But the parents could've, I don't know, handled their finance and family planning better, rather than relying on criminal activity to fund their children's educations.
I don't know. Reading this book (or trying) really just pissed me off, because it more or less excused criminal behavior because the hero loved his family and was, well, the hero. And his redemption/conversion in the end? Not convincing. I don't believe that he's given up theft and gone straight.
I'm pretty sure that there are a couple other thief heroes or heroines in La Nora's backlist, and I'm of two minds about them. She's a very good storyteller, and usually I can buy into her characters and their motivations. But I'm not sure if I'm willing to buy into these particular characters.
I borrowed La Nora's Homeport from the library over the weekend -- I saw a copy on a display, and couldn't remember if I'd read it before. Anyway, the hero is a thief. And I've decided that's just one profession that doesn't work for me for a hero. I don't find anything heroic about stealing; even Robin Hood is a hard sell for me. (Alan Rickman's Sheriff of Nottingham utterly overshadows Costner's Prince of Thieves.)
But I like Roarke from the In Death series, don't I? Well, yes. But he makes no excuses about what he did, and was mostly straight by the time Dallas appeared in his life. Plus, as Tiko says in Strangers in Death, Stealing's lazy.
In Homeport, Ryan steals because he can. And his mother (a devout Catholic) justifies it because his ability to steal is a god-given gift. Plus, it paid for college for his siblings. That doesn't work for me as a justification, and I think it is a slippery slope. Because if theft is okay because it is a natural skill, then all kinds of other horrendous behavior must be okay, by the same token. Sociopaths who have a god-given ability to torture should be let on their merry way? I don't think so. And paying for your siblings' educations? Nice. But the parents could've, I don't know, handled their finance and family planning better, rather than relying on criminal activity to fund their children's educations.
I don't know. Reading this book (or trying) really just pissed me off, because it more or less excused criminal behavior because the hero loved his family and was, well, the hero. And his redemption/conversion in the end? Not convincing. I don't believe that he's given up theft and gone straight.
I'm pretty sure that there are a couple other thief heroes or heroines in La Nora's backlist, and I'm of two minds about them. She's a very good storyteller, and usually I can buy into her characters and their motivations. But I'm not sure if I'm willing to buy into these particular characters.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 02:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 03:18 pm (UTC)I have read Three Fates, in which the heroes/heroines steal an artifact from the Bad Guy. And I have Sweet Revenge TBR, but have been reluctant to start it, since it is set in a fictional Arabic country -- it puts me in mind of sheikh Harlequin Presents.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 11:55 pm (UTC)I like the "deeper" Noras though, so it's a favorite of mine.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 05:14 pm (UTC)Lyvvie
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 12:08 pm (UTC)Thievery set in a contemporary romance (or a "realistic" historical one) doesn't work for me because in theory those people are subject to the laws and moral/ethical codes of the society of the time. So maybe my position should be better articulated: it isn't that heroes and heroines can't/don't steal; it's that I don't find criminal behavior admirable in a hero or heroine. Rather like a book I read a while back in which the hero tortured someone; again, in my mind, heroes/heroine don't torture. Yes, I'm imposing my morality on what I read. Is it fair? No, probably not.
I think maybe I could buy into a fantasy novel in which thievery was a legitimate profession, complete with guild and "rules", but it would take careful world building. Duh, jmc, I have done this already -- with Megan Whalen Turner's YA series.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 05:34 pm (UTC)Scolding the heroine
Date: 2008-04-08 12:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 10:03 pm (UTC)But I suppose I'm more bothered by romances where the heroes/heroines are assassins or mercenaries. Can't see that at all. Doesn't matter if they 'retire' - they killed people for money - what's to love?
Robin Hood, on the other hand - I see him through the myth, as a folk hero. He's sort of like King Arthur - less a person, more an embodiment of English virtues. You could argue that the story lasts because it's a fable - not saying that theft is right, but that oppression is wrong, and that the role of a true Englishman is to oppose that. You don't cheer for Robin because he steals from the rich, you admire him because he fights for the poor.
Marianne McA
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 12:11 pm (UTC)