SBD -- nicknames
Mar. 19th, 2007 11:24 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
'Tis Monday! Smart Bitches Day! And an urge to expound upon romance has spread like a plague across the land. Well, maybe not all across the land, but at least to little pockets of it.
Today's exposition shall be brief, forsooth. Nicknames. Honey. Baby. Sweetheart. Querida. Dorogaya. My little cabbage (pronounced in an appropriately cheese fake French accent, please). Sugarbritches. Bitch. Well, maybe not that last. Although I do love the t-shirts that read, "You call me a bitch like it's a bad thing." Hee.
Will someone please explain to me the nickname "honey girl"? Puh-leeze? Pretty please? I've read it in contemporaries; I've read it in historicals; I've read it in nookieless romances and in erotic romances. Elizabeth Lowell's heroes in particular love the moniker, mostly to refer to women they have a hard on for but don't trust at all. I don't need a literal explanation -- the hero is referring to how sweet he thinks the heroine is...or so I imagine. But I need to understand why so many authors think it is a sexy endearment. Because it strikes me as patronizing (girl, along with the idea that a woman is desirable only because she is sweet and innocent), along with being kind of porn-ish. Truly, when I read the phrase in a novel, the porn soundtrack starts playing in my head -- bow chick a bow wow. And I expect a cheesy sex scene, with really poor dialogue and lighting, to follow immediately. It just seems totally forced and unsexy to me. Am I missing something?
Today's exposition shall be brief, forsooth. Nicknames. Honey. Baby. Sweetheart. Querida. Dorogaya. My little cabbage (pronounced in an appropriately cheese fake French accent, please). Sugarbritches. Bitch. Well, maybe not that last. Although I do love the t-shirts that read, "You call me a bitch like it's a bad thing." Hee.
Will someone please explain to me the nickname "honey girl"? Puh-leeze? Pretty please? I've read it in contemporaries; I've read it in historicals; I've read it in nookieless romances and in erotic romances. Elizabeth Lowell's heroes in particular love the moniker, mostly to refer to women they have a hard on for but don't trust at all. I don't need a literal explanation -- the hero is referring to how sweet he thinks the heroine is...or so I imagine. But I need to understand why so many authors think it is a sexy endearment. Because it strikes me as patronizing (girl, along with the idea that a woman is desirable only because she is sweet and innocent), along with being kind of porn-ish. Truly, when I read the phrase in a novel, the porn soundtrack starts playing in my head -- bow chick a bow wow. And I expect a cheesy sex scene, with really poor dialogue and lighting, to follow immediately. It just seems totally forced and unsexy to me. Am I missing something?
no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 04:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 04:53 pm (UTC)Milaya
Date: 2007-03-19 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 05:02 pm (UTC)I agree that "Honey Girl" is annoying and patronizing and ew ick. I'm not a fan of honey-ish sweetness anyways. Honey Pie is perhaps the most sickly moniker. Gives me toothache.
It reminds me of Nell Carter. I don't know why.
Lyvvie
Honey Pie
Date: 2007-03-19 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 06:17 pm (UTC)I've never been a fan of "cupcake" as an endearment, unless it's used in a supremely sarcastic mode.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-20 11:14 am (UTC)Anything to do with cats. Kitten especially.
I'm having a brain melt because there is a phrase that I can see coming a mile away and I always pray it isn't about to happen and then WHAM, it's there and I want to cry. Hmmm, I really thought it was kitten, oh, and I never need to read 'sheath your claws, kitten' again in a book.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-20 12:09 pm (UTC)Ugh, kitten. And I'm reading an ebook now where the hero calls his lover Pet. Ick.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-20 12:10 pm (UTC)Nora
no subject
Date: 2007-03-20 12:27 pm (UTC)lowell
Date: 2007-03-21 11:59 am (UTC)Re: lowell
Date: 2007-03-21 02:07 pm (UTC)Re: lowell
Date: 2007-03-21 03:12 pm (UTC)Small warrior was a contemp, Love Song For a Raven. Probably Lowell's beta-est hero, but boring as hell, I'm afraid.
Re: lowell
Date: 2007-03-21 04:01 pm (UTC)