Ick and and a rec.
Aug. 8th, 2007 08:11 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Tell me again why Reese's/Hershey thought that creating a banana peanut butter cup was a good idea. Was there market research that showed a huge demand for this product? Ick.
Are you interested in reading a contemporary romance set in LA? One that is on the fringes of the movie business but isn't all about actors and models? Want to read a book with a smart, real heroine and interesting but not overpowering secondary characters? Go check out Sandra Kitt's Celluloid Memories. If I get myself organized, I'll post a review. (If I don't get around to it, lemme just say that I really, really liked this book. B/B+)
The reason I'm posting a rec and blabbing about the book in a non-review-ish kind of way is that it's got me thinking about non-romance things. After reading CM, I read the article in this week's Economist about Latino-Black race relations in LA and elsewhere in the US. That dynamic isn't mentioned at all in the book, but other race/culture dynamics are, particularly the tension between black people who can (and choose to) "pass". There's a fascinating parallel in the story between actresses (secondary characters) of different generations: one chose to pass in order to have a career and the other cannot be cast in traditional black female roles and thus is forced into passing by casting agents. It was a fascinating (and disturbing) glimpse into the realities of the entertainment business.
Are you interested in reading a contemporary romance set in LA? One that is on the fringes of the movie business but isn't all about actors and models? Want to read a book with a smart, real heroine and interesting but not overpowering secondary characters? Go check out Sandra Kitt's Celluloid Memories. If I get myself organized, I'll post a review. (If I don't get around to it, lemme just say that I really, really liked this book. B/B+)
The reason I'm posting a rec and blabbing about the book in a non-review-ish kind of way is that it's got me thinking about non-romance things. After reading CM, I read the article in this week's Economist about Latino-Black race relations in LA and elsewhere in the US. That dynamic isn't mentioned at all in the book, but other race/culture dynamics are, particularly the tension between black people who can (and choose to) "pass". There's a fascinating parallel in the story between actresses (secondary characters) of different generations: one chose to pass in order to have a career and the other cannot be cast in traditional black female roles and thus is forced into passing by casting agents. It was a fascinating (and disturbing) glimpse into the realities of the entertainment business.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-08 01:59 pm (UTC)The reason is *Elvis*
But apart from that - people like peanut butter and banana sandwiches, and chocolate and peanute butter are made for each other - so it seems natural to me. Far more than Diet Vanilla Cherry Dr. Pepper, for instance.
Need I remind you how many Elvis fans there are - especially down south?
And, I, for one, happen to love them.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From Carrie http://lovelysalome.blogspot.com
Date: 2007-08-08 03:16 pm (UTC)Re: From Carrie http://lovelysalome.blogspot.com
From:Yum!
Date: 2007-08-09 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 03:00 am (UTC)Also, I was struck by what seems a kind of anti-Latino bias in the article, in this, for example:
"The Latino struggle is quite different. Its goal is often the selective or non-enforcement of the law, particularly on immigration. A common demand, for example, is for local police not to co-operate with federal immigration agents. And, whereas blacks in the 1960s demanded power in proportion to their numbers as adult citizens, Hispanics want rather more."
I'm not sure there's *one* Latino issue or struggle, but in CA, it was Latinos who cast the decisive votes to deny public benefits to undocumented immigrants, and Latinos also voted in significant numbers for Proposition 209, the state constitutional amendment prohibiting affirmative action in the state. Some of the more established immigrants are actually much more conservative in their attitudes to newer immigrants. Also, the rates at which Latinos join the military is incredibly high. Almost three quarters of a million Latinos fought, for example, in WWII; they are often among the most patriotic of immigrants. To assert that the Latino agenda is all about thwarting law enforcement is a really prejudiced pov, I'm afraid, and it makes me wonder about the entire agenda of that piece.
Robin
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-08-10 03:01 am (UTC)