SBD: pathetic editing
Today's SBD shall be brief and to-the-point.
Editorial staffs everywhere: WTF?!?
Maybe editorial staffs have disappeared in this recession, which might explain some of the sloppy writing.
Here are three typos or editing gaffes that I caught while reading last weekend. There were more, but these are the ones that I remember without consulting the books in question.
I make spelling and grammar errors as I blog. And, unfortunately, in work papers, too. Everyone does it. We're all human.
Here's the thing, though, NY publishers and small epublishers: when I'm buying a book and I read sentences that lack punctuation and seem to not even have a passing acquaintance with the idea of S-V-O? When homophones are repeatedly misused and common spelling errors that even SpellCheck should catch are littered through out the book? I feel like returning the damn book and asking for a refund, or perhaps converting the document to .doc, fixing the obvious errors (not necessarily the dubious stylistic choices, though) and redlining it, then sending it back to the epublisher.
Editorial staffs everywhere: WTF?!?
Maybe editorial staffs have disappeared in this recession, which might explain some of the sloppy writing.
Here are three typos or editing gaffes that I caught while reading last weekend. There were more, but these are the ones that I remember without consulting the books in question.
- amatuer is not a word; probably the author meant "amateur"
- when putting out a BOLO, the subject is not of "Indian decent" but of "Indian descent" -- that "s" makes a difference not only in meaning but in pronunciation
- "no" is not the same as "know", and when a character lacks knowledge, "I don't no" is not the correct way to phrase the idea
- to =/= too =/= two
I make spelling and grammar errors as I blog. And, unfortunately, in work papers, too. Everyone does it. We're all human.
Here's the thing, though, NY publishers and small epublishers: when I'm buying a book and I read sentences that lack punctuation and seem to not even have a passing acquaintance with the idea of S-V-O? When homophones are repeatedly misused and common spelling errors that even SpellCheck should catch are littered through out the book? I feel like returning the damn book and asking for a refund, or perhaps converting the document to .doc, fixing the obvious errors (not necessarily the dubious stylistic choices, though) and redlining it, then sending it back to the epublisher.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-03-11 08:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject